About two weeks ago, there was an article somewhere in The Star, something about Malaysian teenagers are willing to take bribes which can be read
here.
Anyway, the interesting points of the story. First the survey was taken in 2002. (
Note: Strange, it took them 3 years to publish the results of the survey?) And second, 30% of high school leavers are willing to take bribes.
I disagree with the guy who made the survey that it's
ONLY a small sample of the population. 2.4% of the entire Malaysian population is definitely not much, but then again, I suppose there should be a similar trend over different age groups, and perhaps my cynicism has conjectured the hypothesis that there is a positive correlation between age and tendency to take bribes. After all, I cynically believe that it has something to do with lack of naivette as one gets older and ones heart becomes filled with similar-typed cynicism and once one has accepted a bribe once, there's no reason not to do it again.
I suppose there are a couple of worrying things about this seemingly innocuous, downplayed survey results. First, that it seems strange that teenagers are somewhat given the impression that they can take bribes while in school where they are not put into any actual situation to recieve bribes or possess any personal experience on corruption. Corruption, as it would seem, has spilled over from society into the lives of teenagers, which makes today's teenagers believe they can take bribes. But I am not suggesting that Malaysia is a corrupt country, it doesn't have to be for this effect to take place, rather that even the public perception towards corruption and the prejudice that corruption is rampant in Malaysia's society would also cause a similar effect.
Secondly, I am sort of amazed by the lack of public response towards the matter, save one
e-mail by a reader of The Star saying something about teenagers should be taught not to be corrupt. Okay, maybe I missed a couple of letters and e-mails, but this is the only one I saw. But let me tell this from my perspective. Upon reading the results of the survey, I believe I am ashamed to say that I was indifferent to it. My thoughts went something like, "Hmm... my only surprise was it was kinda low." I honestly think that this guy had his heart in the right place, but his solution remains somewhat wrong. Because it isn't about teaching the young not to be corrupt, but rather not teaching the young to be corrupt.
I look with scorn upon certain public campaigns such as the anti-smoking campaigns. Response from the public seems lukewarm. And I believe that formal education cannot be the key to raising civic-minded citizens, while informal education sends mixed messages. While one learns the definition of integrity in Pendidikan Moral, one is also exposed to certain political events which go something like, "I want to win the elections by a million votes." While adults cannot even show similar moral fibre in the real world, how do we expect teenagers, with minds moldable, innocent and naive like mine, to display even a bit of moral integrity in a hypothetical situation?