I just ran my blog though a Fiesh-Kincaid test just to test the reading level of my blog. Apparently, my blog was ranked pretty low, about as readable as TV guides and *gasp*(!!) the Bible. Yeah... figures. Seems my writing isn't so deep after all. But what's the point of being grandiloquent when all that is said is my usual "verbiagic" nonsense?
Oh yeah, one needs about nine years of education to be able to understand the words I type.
But I profess a bit of indignance when I present such poor results of my blog, I would at least like to appear slightly intellectual over certain (in)famous Singaporean blogs. However, I feel that the test was flawed because firstly, all that mattered was the length of the sentence and secondly the number of multi-syllabic words. So I suppose if I type a sentence like, "The perfunctory enunciation of this highfalutin articulation expoused with the benefaction of a thesaurus vocalise bagatelle" then the reading difficulty of my blog would increase. However, I've just said nothing but bullsh*t, so yeah, perhaps the difficulty of a reading should not be measured by the countable but rather the uncountable and we can dismiss my pathetic rating (c'mon! TV guides! That's low! I hate tv guides!) as a victim of the need by Americans (Yes! This dumb rating could only come from there!) to determine whether a book is too difficult for them to read.
Oh yeah, one needs about nine years of education to be able to understand the words I type.
But I profess a bit of indignance when I present such poor results of my blog, I would at least like to appear slightly intellectual over certain (in)famous Singaporean blogs. However, I feel that the test was flawed because firstly, all that mattered was the length of the sentence and secondly the number of multi-syllabic words. So I suppose if I type a sentence like, "The perfunctory enunciation of this highfalutin articulation expoused with the benefaction of a thesaurus vocalise bagatelle" then the reading difficulty of my blog would increase. However, I've just said nothing but bullsh*t, so yeah, perhaps the difficulty of a reading should not be measured by the countable but rather the uncountable and we can dismiss my pathetic rating (c'mon! TV guides! That's low! I hate tv guides!) as a victim of the need by Americans (Yes! This dumb rating could only come from there!) to determine whether a book is too difficult for them to read.